Federal Sentencing Hearing
Not surprisingly, one of the first questions that my clients accused of criminal activity ask me is: What can I expect at my federal sentencing hearing? If my client is charged with a federal crime, it is necessary to determine to what extent the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines will apply. The answer is, while no longer mandatory, they are very important, and usually provide a clear barometer of what the ultimate sentence will be.
Background on The Sentencing Guidelines
In response to complaints that the sentences for federal crimes handed out varied considerably depending upon either the judge or the federal district in which the case was pending, Congress passed The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, (the “Sentencing Reform Act”). The Sentencing Reform Act, in turn, created a Sentencing Commission which was responsible for creating a Sentencing Guidelines Manual (the “Guidelines Manual”).
The Guidelines Manual, which is updated annually, specifies sentences for almost all federal crimes using a point system. The point system issues points on the basis of the type of offense committed, the manner in which it was committed, and the offender’s criminal history. Under the point system, a sentencing guidelines range is calculated that generally covers six to nine month periods, with the lowest range 0 to 6 months, and the highest range the equivalent of life imprisonment.
As a result of the Sentencing Reform Act, the Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory. However, many in the legal community complained that the Guidelines were often too harsh and too rigid. Accordingly, in United States v. Booker (2005), the Supreme Court limited the reach of the Sentencing Guidelines. First, the Supreme Court held that the sentencing ranges specified in the Guidelines Manual are only advisory, not mandatory. Thus, federal judges now have discretion in determining sentences, and a federal appellate court can only overturn a trial judge’s sentence for abuse of discretion. (See Gall v. United States, Sup. Ct. 2007). Second, a judge cannot “enhance” a sentence unless either the offender has admitted to the facts giving rise to the enhancement, or a jury has determined that those facts have been established.
Has Booker Really Changed Things?
The Sentencing Commission issued a report in 2006, and that report concluded that, despite Booker, a majority of judges were still issuing sentences that conformed to the Guidelines Manual. I believe that the same is true today. Moreover, in the 2007 case of Rita v. United States, the Supreme Court held that sentences within the applicable Guidelines Range were presumed to be reasonable.
Significantly, the federal sentencing statute, 18 U.S.C. §3553(a), entitled “Factors To Be Considered in Imposing a Sentence,” requires that the court consider, among a number of other factors,[1] the Guidelines Range under the Guidelines Manual [§3553(a)(4)(A)(i)], as well as “any pertinent policy statement” issued under the Guidelines Manual. [§3553(a)(5)(A)]. Moreover, with limited exceptions, federal judges “shall impose a sentence of the kind, and within the range” determined by applying the Sentencing Guidelines. [18 U.S.C. §3553(b)(1)]. Indeed, the court, at the time of sentencing, must state why it imposed a particular sentence, and, if the sentence is within a Sentencing Guidelines range that exceeds 24 months, “the reason for imposing a sentence at a particular point within the range.” [18 U.S.C. §3553(c)(1)]. Finally, if the sentence imposed is “not of the kind, or is outside the range” of the Sentencing Guidelines, the court must explain the specific reasons why. [18 U.S.C. §3553(c)(2)].
So Where Are We At Concerning the Sentencing Guidelines, and What do We do About It?
With all due respect to Booker, the Sentencing Guidelines still effectively control in the majority of federal criminal cases. Thus, as a standard practice, I always do a preliminary Sentencing Guidelines analysis as soon as practical after being retained. Moreover, over time, as the evidence is reviewed and the facts of the case are established, I update my analysis. Finally, I always explain to my client what the Sentencing Guidelines are and how they will likely impact his or her sentence should a guilty plea or conviction following a trial occur.
The moral of the story is: “Beware of the Sentencing Guidelines.”
[1] These other factors include the following:
(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant;
(2) the need for the sentence imposed-
(A) to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense;
(B) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct;
(C) to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and
(D) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective manner;
(3) the kinds of sentences available;
CNN Exclusive: Justin Paperny Analyzes Sam Bankman-Fried’s 25-Year Sentence
https://youtu.be/KgP_9aRrEZs I was saddened to hear Sam Bankman-Fried say his useful life is over. Many individuals facing prison share that sentiment, and I certainly did during my own experience. Navigating through such challenging times requires learning from those...
Breaking Down Sam Bankman-Fried’s Upcoming Sentencing
https://youtube.com/live/WC59hWkUUE8 Join me in this live session as I cover the upcoming sentencing hearing of Sam Bankman-Fried, scheduled for tomorrow before Judge Kaplan. As many of you are aware, the government is pushing for a hefty term of up to 50 years in...
Get Out Of Federal Prison Early!
If you are going to federal prison, we know you want out as quickly as possible. But how? https://youtube.com/live/2jTG3MexFog It starts with understanding stakeholders, including case managers. Case managers are key figures within this system, maintaining lists...
What’s Next for Peter Navarro at Miami Federal Prison Camp?
Following a CNN interview about Peter Navarro, I got many nasty Instagram messages and a phone call from someone claiming to be close to his family. Essentially, he called to reprimand me or give me the "411," as he said. To be clear, I don't think Peter Navarro...
White Collar Advice: Your Guide Through the Sentencing Journey
Hi Alec Burlakoff here, with White Collar Advice. I am writing to share insights on the sentencing journey. This morning, I had a talk with someone who felt like he was navigating through a storm without a compass when it came to sentencing and mitigation. It struck...
The Most DANGEROUS Thing In A Federal Prison Camp
https://youtube.com/shorts/KlWP-3VOVvo Federal Prison Camp My first day in federal prison included the basics: ProcessingObserving the layout of the campEating in the chow hallStanding for count You know the basics! Yet, it was during a seemingly mundane walk around...