Plead Early or Pay Later: The Brutal Truth About Federal Sentencing

In federal cases with multiple defendants, early decisions impact everyone involved. Defendants often face a choice: plead early or hold out for a better deal. Those who delay accepting responsibility usually face harsher consequences.

When defendants plead guilty early, they set a precedent. If their deals include federal prison time, it becomes harder for those who follow to avoid similar sentences. Courts see early pleas as a sign of cooperation. Later pleas can be viewed as resistance or denial.

Dr. Phil told me, โ€œIf the early people made deals that included prison time, thereโ€™s no way those that come after them can do it without prison.โ€ This pattern holds true in many federal cases. Once a baseline is set, itโ€™s rare for later deals to be more lenient.

Delaying a plea forces the government to spend more resources preparing for trial. Prosecutors often argue, โ€œYour Honor, we had to invest significant time and resources because this defendant delayed the inevitable.โ€ These delays usually lead to longer sentences and fewer chances for favorable outcomes.
I encourage defendants (if they did it) to act as soon as they decide to take responsibility. If youโ€™ve made mistakes, acknowledge them and start addressing the consequences. As I often say, โ€œDonโ€™t walkโ€”run to the U.S. Attorneyโ€™s office to take a deal.โ€ The less the government spends on your case, the better your chances for leniency.

Justin Paperny

Read Our New York Times Article

And Lessons From Prison, Free!

This is a staging environment