February 2, 2016
When Law Enforcement Comes Knocking — What Are Your Options?
Part 2 of 5: When You Lie To The Government, What Crime (Or Crimes) Are You Committing?
In Part 1 of my series on government interviews, I discussed the options available to someone who is approached by government agents for an interview, and suggested that the best option is probably to postpone the interview and contact a white collar defense attorney for advice. In Part 2 of this series, I’ll look at the criminal statutes you could be violating if you lie to the government. And remember, it’s usually much easier for the government to prove that someone lied to them than to prove the underlying crime that was being investigated. That’s why the government pursues so many of these cases.
The False Statements Statute, Section 1001
The key statute used by the government to charge someone with lying to government agents is what’s called the false statements statute, found at 18 United States Code, Section 1001. So what are the elements of Section 1001? In other words, what could result in the government charging you with a violation of Section 1001? The elements of Section 1001 are straight forward:
- A false statement (oral or written) was made to a government agency or employee of that agency
- The statement was material
- The statement was made with knowledge of its illegality
- The statement was made in a matter within the jurisdiction of a federal agency, or the executive, legislative or judicial branches of the federal government
It’s also important to know that to be charged with a violation of Section 1001 you don’t need to have made a written statement or have been under oath. Rather, all statements are covered:
- Oral and written
- Sworn and unsworn
- Voluntary and required by law
- Signed or unsigned
Even silence can constitute a false statement under Section 1001 when it serves to mislead. So, if you’ve submitted to an interview, and you learn that the agents have key facts wrong, you may need to speak up and correct their misunderstanding.
A key element of Section 1001 is that the statement must be “material”. What does that mean? The Supreme Court has held that a false statement is considered to be material if it has a “natural tendency to influence, or [be] capable of influencing” the government’s investigation.
- Therefore, the government doesn’t even need to prove that your lie influenced anyone.
- The government need only prove that the false statement was significant to its inquiry.
Fortunately, after much judicial criticism, the government has recently conceded that, in order to be convicted under Section 1001, you must know not only that your statement is false, but also that it’s a crime to lie to the government. This should prompt government agents to advise an individual prior to his or her interview that lying to the government is a crime, but I suspect they’ll do it in a very innocuous way and won’t highlight it. So beware.
Some Other Criminal Statutes To Be Aware Of
If you lie to the government, Section 1001 isn’t the only criminal statute you need to worry about. Under the appropriate circumstances, you could also be charged with obstruction of justice, “impeding” an investigation, or with perjury if you’re under oath and either testify falsely or submit a false declaration in a proceeding.
Given all of the pitfalls you could face if you submit to a surprise government interview, including the possibility of facing the criminal charges discussed herein if you lie, perhaps the smartest thing to do if approached by government agents is to politely turn them away and reach out to an experienced white collar defense lawyer for advice.
Contact Me Now If You Have Questions – Even if you are outside New York and New Jersey, I work with experienced white collar defense attorneys across the country. After we speak, I can make an introduction.
This blog is the second of several that I’ll be posting on the issue of government interviews. If you’d like to learn more, please feel free to reach out to me at (212) 592-1513 or through email at email@example.com. I practice white collar criminal defense and securities and bank regulatory defense in New York, New Jersey and elsewhere, and my contact information is included in the link below.
If you've been following the news, you know that our partner, Justin Paperny, has been doing amazing work! Earlier this week, Washington Post reporter, Peter Holley, contacted our team. American readers wanted to learn more about how people prepared for prison. He was...
Success After A Federal Indictment We’re grateful to Peter Holley at The Washington Post for bringing attention to our work at White Collar Advice and Prison Professors. • Click Here To Read The Article: Convicted Felon Helping People Charged In the College Admissions...
My Thoughts on the College Admissions Scandal As you would expect, I have received a number of calls, emails and text messages over the massive college admission scandal that broke yesterday. I have been asked by friends, clients and media the following: 1: Will...
What CAN You Bring To Federal Prison? The text below is from a YouTube video I recently filmed... Apparently, I have nine minutes to get everything in because I was looking at some of my YouTube data, and apparently, my retention rate is about nine minutes, which is...
February 20, 2019 Readers of our work know that we believe defendants need to take action to get the best outcome. If your goal is to outsource all of your work to your lawyer, you should not be on this page. One way that defendants can prepare is through the...
Regret From Federal Prison From May 2009 until September 2014 about 22% of the people who called me were home from prison. I stopped tracking in September 2014. Many called for my prison consulting advice. Others called to complain...others just asked me to listen....