February 2, 2016
When Law Enforcement Comes Knocking — What Are Your Options?
Part 2 of 5: When You Lie To The Government, What Crime (Or Crimes) Are You Committing?
In Part 1 of my series on government interviews, I discussed the options available to someone who is approached by government agents for an interview, and suggested that the best option is probably to postpone the interview and contact a white collar defense attorney for advice. In Part 2 of this series, I’ll look at the criminal statutes you could be violating if you lie to the government. And remember, it’s usually much easier for the government to prove that someone lied to them than to prove the underlying crime that was being investigated. That’s why the government pursues so many of these cases.
The False Statements Statute, Section 1001
The key statute used by the government to charge someone with lying to government agents is what’s called the false statements statute, found at 18 United States Code, Section 1001. So what are the elements of Section 1001? In other words, what could result in the government charging you with a violation of Section 1001? The elements of Section 1001 are straight forward:
- A false statement (oral or written) was made to a government agency or employee of that agency
- The statement was material
- The statement was made with knowledge of its illegality
- The statement was made in a matter within the jurisdiction of a federal agency, or the executive, legislative or judicial branches of the federal government
It’s also important to know that to be charged with a violation of Section 1001 you don’t need to have made a written statement or have been under oath. Rather, all statements are covered:
- Oral and written
- Sworn and unsworn
- Voluntary and required by law
- Signed or unsigned
Even silence can constitute a false statement under Section 1001 when it serves to mislead. So, if you’ve submitted to an interview, and you learn that the agents have key facts wrong, you may need to speak up and correct their misunderstanding.
A key element of Section 1001 is that the statement must be “material”. What does that mean? The Supreme Court has held that a false statement is considered to be material if it has a “natural tendency to influence, or [be] capable of influencing” the government’s investigation.
- Therefore, the government doesn’t even need to prove that your lie influenced anyone.
- The government need only prove that the false statement was significant to its inquiry.
Fortunately, after much judicial criticism, the government has recently conceded that, in order to be convicted under Section 1001, you must know not only that your statement is false, but also that it’s a crime to lie to the government. This should prompt government agents to advise an individual prior to his or her interview that lying to the government is a crime, but I suspect they’ll do it in a very innocuous way and won’t highlight it. So beware.
Some Other Criminal Statutes To Be Aware Of
If you lie to the government, Section 1001 isn’t the only criminal statute you need to worry about. Under the appropriate circumstances, you could also be charged with obstruction of justice, “impeding” an investigation, or with perjury if you’re under oath and either testify falsely or submit a false declaration in a proceeding.
Given all of the pitfalls you could face if you submit to a surprise government interview, including the possibility of facing the criminal charges discussed herein if you lie, perhaps the smartest thing to do if approached by government agents is to politely turn them away and reach out to an experienced white collar defense lawyer for advice.
Contact Me Now If You Have Questions – Even if you are outside New York and New Jersey, I work with experienced white collar defense attorneys across the country. After we speak, I can make an introduction.
This blog is the second of several that I’ll be posting on the issue of government interviews. If you’d like to learn more, please feel free to reach out to me at (212) 592-1513 or through email at firstname.lastname@example.org. I practice white collar criminal defense and securities and bank regulatory defense in New York, New Jersey and elsewhere, and my contact information is included in the link below.
January 6, 2019 I've been working on a white collar crime show with a writer and executive producer I respect. Odds of bringing a new show to market are low. Still, it happened once with the movie I made with NBC Universal and Esquire. If it were to happen again, this...
Does it seem like a good idea to surrender drunk to federal prison? If you think the answer is yes, we have a problem. Why? Yesterday, I received a call from a wife whose husband is in prison. Apparently, some consultant told this defendant to show up to prison drunk....
For many months I have been sharing my thoughts on the Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen cases. Now that Michael Cohen has been sentenced to federal prison a number of media outlets are reaching out to me get my advice and thoughts on Cohen's 36 month prison term. Where...
November 24, 2018 For transparency, I filmed this video with Learned Jay Hand nearly a month ago. Work, family responsibilities and the Los Angeles fires delayed me from posting this video. I am pleased to report that Jay is doing incredibly well at Butner Federal...
Tips for Setting Up Your Career Change After Federal Prison As readers know, I started my career change while serving time at Taft Federal Prison Camp. I had been inside a few months before deciding that I wanted to build a new career as a corporate ethics speaker and...
Federal Prison Consultant Offers Thoughts Before Georgetown Law School Lecture While walking to Georgetown Law School today to lecture, I received an interesting phone call. The call was so interesting I decided to film a short impromptu video only minutes before my...